Sonam Raghuvanshi Won't Go Back to Jail: What the Supreme Court Actually Said

The Raja Raghuvanshi honeymoon murder case took another turn on Friday, as the Supreme Court declined to send Sonam Raghuvanshi back behind bars, even while making it clear the judges aren't entirely comfortable with how the Meghalaya High Court handled her bail.

What happened in court

A bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Sheel Nagu heard the Meghalaya government's plea challenging the High Court order that had upheld Sonam's bail. But instead of putting her back in custody, the bench chose a middle path — it issued formal notice on the state's petition, asked Sonam's lawyers to file a counter-affidavit, and posted the matter for further hearing next Thursday.

What stood out was the bench's own remark during the hearing. The judges admitted they had "reservations" about the High Court's reasoning, essentially signalling they weren't fully convinced bail should have been granted. Yet, because Sonam had already walked out of jail and was living in Shillong under the trial court's bail conditions, the bench felt cancelling it at this stage wasn't the right call. As the judges put it, the matter would be "seen" as the trial itself proceeds.

Why the state government is unhappy
Representing the Meghalaya government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta didn't hold back, calling the High Court's bail order "really shocking." His argument was straightforward: this wasn't some minor case. According to Mehta, Sonam and her husband Raja had gone to Meghalaya for their honeymoon when the alleged murder took place — a killing he described as premeditated, carried out with the help of three accomplices, with Raja's body dumped in a gorge afterward. He also pointed out that Sonam had gone absconding before eventually being arrested in Uttar Pradesh, and argued she posed a genuine flight risk.
The bail itself hinges on a technical slip. The trial court and later the High Court found that police records had wrongly cited Section 403(1) of the BNS instead of Section 103(1), which deals with murder — meaning Sonam was technically never told in her arrest documents that murder was the actual charge against her. Mehta insisted this was nothing more than a clerical error, but the courts below didn't see it that way. The Meghalaya High Court, in fact, went further, with Justice W. Diengdoh observing that the way the grounds of arrest were prepared showed a "total non-application of judicious mind" by the arresting agency, since the paperwork gave no real clarity on what she was actually being charged with.

Where the case stands now
For now, Sonam remains free, living in Shillong as her trial continues. The Supreme Court hasn't shut the door on the state's challenge — it's simply chosen not to reverse a bail order that's already taken effect, while leaving the door open to revisit the issue once her side responds. The next hearing is set for Thursday, and until then, all eyes remain on how this legally messy but high-profile case unfolds.

To recap the background: Raja Raghuvanshi, a businessman from Indore, had travelled to Meghalaya's Sohra area with his wife Sonam shortly after their wedding in May 2025. The couple went missing during the trip, and Raja's body was later recovered from a gorge near Weisawdong Falls. Police allege Sonam conspired with her alleged lover and a group of hired men to kill her husband.

Also Read :- Pune man Ketan Agarwal's murder shocks Hina Khan, actor says accused Siya Goyal could've spared him ‘bas ek sach bolke